Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers" Results 101 - 120 of 471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
The latter two are as creative as they are provocative.The Continuing Relevance of Billy BuddBilly Budd is relevant today because we—lawyers, judges, society—continue to wrestle with the difficult question whether to follow the literal text of the law when doing so may sacrifice justice in a specific case.During the confirmation hearings for then-Judge Neil Gorsuch for appointment to the Supreme Court, for example, much was made of his dissent in TransAm Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:56 pm by Liisa Speaker
 However, the Court of Appeals changed the direction again last year in Madson v Jaso (Docket No. 331605) and Ozimek v Rodgers (Docket No. 331726). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" Read on here.From the Faculty Lounge: coverage of an AALS panel on the legacy of Griswold v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As the Article discusses, the Supreme Court considered Hamilton’s views on this subject, specifically in the context of the President’s removal authority, when deciding Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Will
This is intended to limit the effect of Thomas v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]