Search for: "Rodgers v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am by INFORRM
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
At FindLaw, Rodger Citron has this essay on the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed Lord Rodger had specifically contemplated that if an order had particularly serious consequences it may be acceptable provided “that it had only a limited life-span and was replaced, as soon as practically possible, by equivalent legislation passed by Parliament. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (involving states’ efforts to regulate the private intermediaries between insurance companies and pharmacies) and Tanzin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
First, in the case of R v Briggs-Price [2009] UKHL 19, Lord Rodger and Lord Neuberger both expressed doubts as to whether allegations of criminal conduct for the purposes of confiscation proceedings could be proved to the civil standard. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Lord Rodger agrees with Lords Hope and Walker, with nothing further. [read post]