Search for: "Rodgers v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
(The stay application is Stroup, et al., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Will
This is intended to limit the effect of Thomas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
The district court didn't let him, holding that the United States and California were already defendants and had more than adequate incentives to defend the relevant tax statutes.  [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 4:17 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 107884 (MD TN, Sept. 22, 2011), a Tennessee federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a claim that a county jail failed to provide Muslim religious services.In Rodgers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am by Mike
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 3:41 pm
” The Court concluded that since there was no actual prejudice to the civil litigants in this case, the jury verdict could stand, in accordance with State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Albina Gasanbekova
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Rodgers, 12-382 (state-on-top), Burt v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:41 am by Rick Hasen
Supreme Court Rivers examines a series of high-profile districting cases, from Rodgers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am by Gregory Forman
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]