Search for: "Rodgers v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 4:17 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 107884 (MD TN, Sept. 22, 2011), a Tennessee federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a claim that a county jail failed to provide Muslim religious services.In Rodgers v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am by The Charge
  Thus, the state of Maryland did not offend the United States Constitution when it denied counsel to Mr. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:58 am by Gregory Forman
Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), the United States Supreme Court found South Carolina’s methods for support enforcement violated due process. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am by Gregory Forman
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts: The United States Supreme Court to Take a Fresh Look at Personal Jurisdiction Goodyear and McIntyre: General and Specific Personal Jurisdiction Addressed by the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
”[5] In a 2016 decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:37 pm by Samuel Bray
Rodgers, 284 U.S. 521, 529 (1932) ("The equity jurisdiction conferred on inferior courts of the United States by [sec- tion] 11 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 . . . is that of the English court of chancery at the time of the separation of the two countries. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Richard Hasen writes that one of the most significant opinions of the decade, in Citizens United v. [read post]