Search for: "Rodgers v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
He is one of 51 Mexicans on death row in United States. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Rodger alone dissented. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
The district court didn't let him, holding that the United States and California were already defendants and had more than adequate incentives to defend the relevant tax statutes. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2010] EWHC 3376 – Read judgment The Guardian newspaper has failed to convince the High Court that it should be able to see key documents in the trial of three men threatened with extradition to the United States on charges of corruption and bribery. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
lessons from the United States and Canada G. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm
Pinto, “An Overview of United States Corporate Governance in Publicly Traded Corporations,” 58 Am. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
It's called Qaddura v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:58 pm
He also gave the United States 30 days to file a surreply. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
However, religious authorities have nowhere near the influence they have in other jurisdictions such as in the United States, as evidenced by the fact that the religious premises restriction has recently been removed by an amendment to the Equality Act 2010. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The argument was mentioned in Fayed v United Kingdom ((1994) 18 EHRR 393) and it was accepted in Rotaru v Romania ((2000) 8 BHRC 449 [44]). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
