Search for: "Rodriguez v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 11:52 am
RODRIGUEZ, 18 Fla. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
It is from the Complaint, Page 14, Lines 1-4, Rodriguez et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
The Court held that the superior court does not have discretion in sentencing when a firearm restriction is statutorily mandated and the legislature included no discretion to waive or limit the firearm restriction, and ordered the provision stricken from the judgment and sentence. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:41 am
The odds are not good for a judicial challenge to it, and since the decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:34 am
Leona’s Pizzeria, Inc., 222 F.R.D. 574 (N.D.Ill.2004), and Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
The panel I moderated that day in April 2008 had panelists: Barbara Rodriguez Mundell, Presiding Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Maurice Portley, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Pendleton Gaines, Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Dan McAuliffe, State Bar President Ed Novak, State Bar President-Elect That’s a great group of folks to sit around and talk about anything. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:15 am
Employer not be liable for damages resulting from employee’s off duty misconduct absent notice of the employee's proclivity for such misconductAcosta-Rodriguez v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 07470, Decided on October 21, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentAn employee of the New York City Board of Education [BOE] was alleged to have sexually abused two students. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
http://tinyurl.com/yho6hyl Grunstein v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve long written about how workplace harassment law sometimes violates the First Amendment, so I was especially pleased to see today’s Rodriguez v. [read post]
