Search for: "Rodriguez v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
The panel I moderated that day in April 2008 had panelists: Barbara Rodriguez Mundell, Presiding Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Maurice Portley, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Pendleton Gaines, Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Dan McAuliffe, State Bar President Ed Novak, State Bar President-Elect That’s a great group of folks to sit around and talk about anything. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
The Court held that the superior court does not have discretion in sentencing when a firearm restriction is statutorily mandated and the legislature included no discretion to waive or limit the firearm restriction, and ordered the provision stricken from the judgment and sentence. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via Lexisone] Manuel Antonio Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm
See also Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:59 pm
Rodriguez sustained injuries to his head, spine, neck, and left elbow. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
Rodriguez, Richard places an enormous amount of weight on the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
In last year’s Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
Decisions of interest concerning Labor and Employment Law Source: Justia October 21, 2011 Velazquez-Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Ruiz agreed to do so, and further argued that, unlike Turner v Safley, it would not be beyond the court’s jurisdiction to order such accommodations. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 29, 2007 Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Following the release of the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Carter, the leader of the Liberal Party expressed support for the decision and made a motion in the House of Commons to appoint a special committee to ‘consider the ruling of the Supreme Court; that the committee consult with experts and with Canadians, and make recommendations for a legislative framework that will respect the Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the priorities of Canadians. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
The Court issued a stay in that case, Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
