Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by David Klein
On March 15, 2024, a United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in the matter of Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article shows that this decision entails staggering macroeconomic costs, undermines human development in the United States, and has hindered the government from promoting general welfare, domestic tranquility, and common defense. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
 The NTA alleged that Rodriguez (1) was not a citizen or national of the United States, (2) was a native and citizen of Mexico, (3) had entered the United States near Otay Mesa, California, on approximately September 27, 2010, and (4) had not been admitted or paroled after inspection by an immigration officer. . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm by Barbara Moreno
Jeffrey Bellin, Mass Incarceration Nation:  How the United States Became Addicted to Prisons and Jails and How it can Recover (2023). 11. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In the long litany of head-scratching moments emerging from our growing knowledge about the highest-ranking Republican in the United States government, I was both confused and amused when I saw this in The Guardian. [read post]
In the first issue, the defendant argued that Trooper Bivens had unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 11:03 am by Shawn Dominy
  The defendant was convicted and ultimately appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit—whose decisions bind Colorado's school districts—has likewise made clear that any forecast of substantial disruption must rest on a "concrete threat" of substantial disruption. [read post]