Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 3:59 am
In this week’s second opinion, in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
In Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:11 pm
Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:23 am
Today the United States Supreme Court said yes, 5-3.Justice Kennedy assures us that this exception is a narrow one. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:06 am
United States, No. 15-8544. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
If Salim v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
United States, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
United States, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
United States compels a finding that Section 16(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rodriguez Dod Toward Justice: Michael A. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:41 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
However, if the State were to adopt Model Rule 8.4(g), its provisions raise serious concerns about the constitutionality of the restrictions it would place on members of the State Bar and the resulting harm to the clients they represent. [read post]
