Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2014, 7:37 am
United States, No. 13-9972.I'll have more to say on this list later.Over at SCOTUSblog, all their "breaking news" blurb has to say about the list is that the Court took no action on the same-sex marriage cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:33 am
On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
The Court’s refusal to consider the case means states are left to decide the issue of whether workers who entered the United States illegally may benefit from workers’ compensation coverage. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) prohibits the employment of illegal aliens in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Maria Guadalupe Mendoza has published The Thirteen Known Latina Litigants Before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
The ACLU has challenged these policies in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:01 am
Rodriguez-Lopez, _ F.3d _ (6th Cir. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:38 am
Rodriguez-Berrios, __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:49 pm
The group filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
