Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:25 am by Jeff Welty
I may need to update it again after the Supreme Court decides United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
  Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
United States, heard yesterday, which aims to decide whether a traffic stop may be prolonged without suspicion for eight minutes so a drug dog can be brought to the scene for a sniff. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:18 am by Rory Little
United States would “lead to . . . 40 minutes of free time for police officers to investigate any crimes that they want. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
The second case today is Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:04 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]