Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
A federal court can sometimes issue a writ of habeas corpus due to the violation of a federal statute in addition to the violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:29 pm
Oh they'll stay in touch with a civilian counsel, but for some reason don't do that as much with military appellate counsel.And don't forget United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:39 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Ct. 2161 (2008), the United States Supreme Court extensively addressed claim preclusion. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The Public and the Courts , Greg Caldeira Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States 35. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Eric Danner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:25 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
United States and Rodriguez-Martinez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:52 pm
The government's obligation to disclose Brady material encompasses not only oral, unrecorded statements of a cooperating witness that are favorable to the accused, as held in Rodriguez, previously discussed here, but also exculpatory statements communicated to the government by the witness's lawyer, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:44 pm
Shaibu, 920 F.2d at 1426 (citing United States v. [read post]
