Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:44 pm
Shaibu, 920 F.2d at 1426 (citing United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Rodriguez (7th Cir. 1993) 995 F.2d 776, 777–778) and pagers (United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
Rodriguez). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:55 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
United States, 151 U.S. 396 (1894)). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
It also demands that with regard to "reverse Batson" challenges, the defense speaks with one voice, as illustrated in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Rodriguez may make this point. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:29 pm
" See United States v. [read post]