Search for: "Rodriquez v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Rodriquez, No. 06-1646 A sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is reversed where, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), the "maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" for the state drug convictions at issue was a 10-year maximum set by the applicable state recidivist provision. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:15 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:51 pm
Rodriquez, No. 06-1646 "A sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is reversed where, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), the 'maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law' for the state drug convictions at issue was a 10-year maximum set by the applicable state recidivist provision. [read post]
19 May 2008, 10:26 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down four decisions [order list, PDF] Monday, including United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:11 am
You can access today's ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:14 am
Today’s opinion by Justice Alito in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:54 pm
Writing over at CO, Anita Krishnakumar has this fantastic new post, titled "Dejá-Vu in Begay v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:34 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:21 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
In particular, this part highlights the spoken and unspoken premises that influenced the result in Bustamonte and outlines Bustamonte's continuing relevance for consent search cases today.Part III examines United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:10 pm
Gonzaga Rodriquez, No. 06-1646, and Begay v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:51 pm
Rodriquez (06-1646) and Begay v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:30 pm
The transcript of today’s argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:10 pm
Rodriquez (06-1646) and Begay v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Pimentel (06-1204), United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Additional links and information are available on the Rodriquez wiki page, here. [read post]
