Search for: "Roe v. People of State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2025, 8:52 pm by Josh Blackman
The New York Times reported at the time: While careful not to directly make the case for any would-be justice, Mr. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
New York) that inform what modern constitutional law clearly rejects; (2) important recently overruled cases (like Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:58 am by Will Newman
 (For example, Roe was not the actual name of the plaintiff in Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Timothy Roes, Strasbourg Observers: Missaoui and Akhandaf v Belgium: Cold Shower for Belgian Applications: on the recent ECtHR case in which a claim by two Belgium Muslim women against a ban on burkinis in Antwerp was deemed inadmissible. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm by Deirdre Schifeling
Despite these shifts, two blue states, New York and Maryland, voted to enshrine abortion rights into state law. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Seven states enacted new rights protections including Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, and New York. [read post]
In June 2022, the US Supreme Court held that the US Constitution does not protect the right to abortion, overturning the landmark Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 11:57 am by Steve Gottlieb
Then it did what honest counting of votes couldn’t by overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am by Daniel Spiegel
According to a report compiled by an advocacy group, Pregnancy Justice, in the year after Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 3:35 am
But it seems fair enough to let the people decide whether they want a constitutional right, at the state level, that gives them back approximately what they had under the Supreme Court case law before the overruling of Roe v. [read post]