Search for: "Rogers v. Alabama" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
  The late Roger Traynor and his colleagues on the California Supreme Court, who presaged strict product liability way back in 1944 in Escola v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Alabama, 791 F.2d 1450, 1455 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1085 (1987) (citing Rogers, there is no per se rule against municipality suits in the Eleventh Circuit); South Macomb Disposal Authority v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Alabama’s doctrine is somewhat distinct, in that it seems to combine a tough alternative design requirement with a consumer expectation test.  [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
In a partial dissent, Judge Rogers would hold that the allegations were sufficient to trigger claims under NEPA and the CWA. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
A Daily Journal podcast features discussion with Peter Altman about Lucia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2—U.S. and EU Perspectives on Trademark and Design Law in the Next Decade Annette Kur, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Associate Professor, Stockholm University Two regimes coexisting at the community level and harmonized national law; both regimes are interlinked in terms of prior rights in one creating barriers to rights in another.  [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and Judge Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
 Sir Roger Moore has accepted undisclosed libel damages over claims made in the Daily Mail and Mail Online that he groped an actress during the filming of For Your Eyes Only. [read post]