Search for: "Rogers v. Rogers" Results 81 - 100 of 5,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[RT: I would say lots of courts in © also try to reduce merger to meaning that you can do anything but copy verbatim, which is a narrowing that many courts in TM don’t bother with, though some variants of Rogers v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hong has posted Overturning Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia) has posted Principles of Interpretation as Applied to Corporate Articles: A Comment on Rogers v Rogers Communications Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:19 am by Stephen Wermiel
Fitzgerald (holding that the president is immune from civil liability for official acts), Rogers v. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:25 am
In April 2022, INTA filed an amicus brief (pdf here) supporting Jack Daniel's petition for en banc rehearing of the BAD SPANIELS decision in VIP Products LLC v. [read post]