Search for: "Rogers v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 2,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by Alex Gasser
ALJ Rogers determined that “a communication may be subject to the attorney-client privilege even if the communication is between only non-attorneys,” citing, Heriot v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:51 pm by Alex Gasser
WAI also opposed on procedural grounds that Remy (i) did not engage in intensive good faith efforts to resolve the dispute; (ii) failed to provide two days notice to WAI or the remaining parties of the Investigation; (iii) failed to include a required certification of compliance per Ground Rule 3.2; (iv) failed to state the positions of the parties; and (v) prematurely filed its motion before the Discovery Committee reached an impasse in resolving this discovery dispute. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:23 am by Beth Graham
Rogers, Professor of Law, Paul and Marjorie Price Faculty Scholar, and Professor of Ethics, Regulation, and The Rule of Law at Pennsylvania State University’s Dickinson School of Law, and Alex Wiker, Post-Graduate Fellow in International Arbitration at Pennsylvania State University, have published “Fraport v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
 Further, ALJ Rogers declined to allow Sidergas the opportunity to amend its response stating that if Sidergas wished to do so, it must file a motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b)(2). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Alex Gasser
ALJ Rogers further denied, as unnecessary, APM’s request that any order granting HP’s motion include a statement clarifying that APM is not precluded from challenging the validity of these five patents in district court, in view of caselaw stating: “decisions of the ITC involving patent issues have no preclusive effect in other forums,” citing Texas Instruments Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Drape Creative, 909 F.3d 257 (9th Cir. 2018), the Honey Badger case, the Ninth Circuit began a process that could make Rogers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
ALJ Rogers stated that Spansion failed to address the third factor, noting also that prior cases make clear that the Commission has a strong interest in maintaining the confidentiality of parties’ competitive business information. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:30 am by Eric Schweibenz
ALJ Rogers further determined that Wistron’s four paragraph pleading did not meet the enhanced pleading standard required by Exergen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:14 am by Eric Schweibenz
Having considered Zoran’s arguments, ALJ Rogers determined to deny Zoran’s motion for an extension of time.  [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:51 pm by Alex Gasser
According to the Order, Dr Souri’s report stated that he performed calculations to determine the relative orientations of metal lines in the metal layers of accused and domestic industry products, and that he relied on these calculations to determine whether these products meet the claim limitations of the ‘625 patent.  [read post]