Search for: "Rogers v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Andrew Flavelle Martin
Amy Salyzyn, “John Rambo v Atticus Finch: Gender, Diversity and the Civility Movement” (2013) 16:1 Legal Ethics 97. [4] Se [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 12:46 pm by admin
The Superior Court denied the motion, and the D. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am by INFORRM
The defamation claim was brought by documentary maker, John Ware against Pink Floyd singer, Roger Waters in relation to comments the musician made in an Al Jazeera programme. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a series of cases from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, one of which I argued, judges have consistently held that an employer cannot. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
 22-7163, Judge Rao, joined by Judges Katsas and Pan, affirmed the decision of the district court to remand to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia a suit brought by the District asserting that various oil and gas companies violated D. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am by Lana Ulrich
Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney wrote the majority opinion, in which the Court held that no Black person, whether enslaved or free, could be an American citizen. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am by Chip Merlin
App. 2011) (‘as a general rule, contracts that are void as contrary to public policy will not be enforced by the courts and the parties will be left as the court found them’); Rogers v. [read post]