Search for: "Rolle v. Rolle"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 8:51 am
In Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 11:48 pm
On the 28th November last year I posted on the above case, which was heard in the High Court, on the redundancy criteria used by Rolls Royce when selecting candidates for redundancy. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:01 am
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union Court of Appeal “Length of service was a lawful criterion for selection for redundancy since it achieved a legitimate aim by a proportionate means. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:10 am
I just updated my website to provide some additional analysis of the Odometer Roll Back and the concept of affirmative, false representations of fact. https://www.consumer-attorney.com/cuesta-v-classic-car-358-n-j-super-512-app-div-2003.html The post Odometer Roll Back and Consumer Fraud in NJ appeared first on New Jersey Lemon Law Lawyer Blog. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Those of us who teach Pierson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:07 am
Rolls Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 387 “A length of service criterion within the selection matrix for redundancy selection, contained in collective agreements between a company and a workers' union, was not in breach of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, in that the inclusion of the criterion was a ‘proportionate means [...] [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 1:56 am
Stone and Rolls (in Liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a Firm) House of Lords “A company, exclusively controlled by a single director so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring a claim for damages against its auditors on the basis that they had failed to detect the fraudulent activities, that they [...] [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:23 am
Rolls-Royce Corp., a Seventh Circuit opinion decided... [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:24 am
The claim at issue in Indianapolis Motor Speedway, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 1:34 pm
Cardona Settlement Continue reading → The post Relief is Rolling Out Now that the Stay was Denied in the Sweet v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:55 am
Stone & Rolls Ltd (in liquidation) v Moore Stephens (a firm) [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] WLR (D) 277 “A company, which was in the exclusive control of its sole director and shareholder so as to be primarily liable for frauds committed against third parties, could not bring an action for damages against its auditors on the [...] [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:31 am
" Coomer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 7:39 am
FCC Chair Ajit Pai has apparently announced his plan to roll back net neutrality rules, first launched by the agency under the Obama administration and ultimately upheld in a 2016 District of Columbia Circuit ruling, United States Telecom Association v.... [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:40 am
Thankfully, according to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in Kelleher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
Drummer Boy Homes Association, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The employee referred to the decision in Pickering Square Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The employee referred to the decision in Pickering Square Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am
Today, April 19, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument on rehearing in a case styled Severance v. [read post]
