Search for: "Rollins v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
Rollins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
Carney, denied a motion to compel arbitration of a PAGA claim brought by Orkin Services of California, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
A state court in California ruled that such a waiver is against California public policy and unenforceable. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm
A state court in California ruled that such a waiver is against California public policy and unenforceable. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
In Rollins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:28 pm
In Rollins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
In Rollins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:05 am
In Rollins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 2:08 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
We were thinking about this truth when we read the recent case of Seedman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
In favorem vitae Sharris Rollins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
The California Supreme Court in Cotran v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Specifically, the standard for investigating harassment claims in California was established in the 1998 case Cotran v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Specifically, the standard for investigating harassment claims in California was established in the 1998 case Cotran v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
In 2007, the victim moved to Colorado and got married while defendant stayed in California with his wife. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
