Search for: "Rolph v. Rolph"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Dominion v Fox News is not the last of the voting machine defamation cases it faces. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:17 am
Justice Lee’s decision followed a decision of the Full Federal Court in Joukhador v Ten Network Pty Ltd in 2021. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
On 7 June 2022, Pepperall J heard an application in Daedone v BBC. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
Whether the Australian court has jurisdiction to enforce the judgment against a US-based company is another question, discussed by media law experts Professor David Rolph and Dr Damien Spry here. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Read David Rolph’s commentary on the piece, including his analysis of injurious falsehood, here. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jacob Schulz sat down with Benjamin Haddad to discuss the factors underlying the French reaction to the AUKUS security pact and its implications for the future of transatlantic relations and U.S. strategy: Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
On 24 June 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Torts Law Journal, Vol 27, No. 1 (in press), David Rolph, The University of Sydney Law School. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
This piece does not suggest that the courts themselves are racist, but that the framework of defamation law is one-sided; Greenstein v Campaign Against Anti-Semitism [2020] EWHC 2951; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB); Hays v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) [3] David Rolph, ‘Racial Discrimination Law as a Means of Protecting Collective Reputations’ in Matthew Rimmer (ed), Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Edward… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Writing before the decision of the Court of Appeal in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611, Professor David Rolph commented in his illuminating chapter on the case in Landmark Cases in Defamation Law (Hart Publishing, 2019), ‘the policy of the law has decisively changed. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Yelda v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
In The Dutra Group v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Historical Society of the New York Courts has posted an excerpt from Paul McGrath's "People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
There are other big cases in the wings and it looks like 2019 will be a bumper year for defamation litigation: Craig McLachlan v Fairfax and the ABC, Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax and the ABC, Ben Roberts-Smith v Fairfax, Sarah Hanson-Young v David Leyonhjelm, John Herron and John Gill v HarperCollins – to mention a handful. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
On INFORRM Oliver Fairhurst has covered the case of Magyar Jeti Zrt v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Events Privacy, Disclosure and Social Exchange Theory, 12 December 2018, 16:10 – 17:30 202 South Hall Berkeley, CA Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Sydney Morning Herald has an opinion piece by David Rolph entitled “Australia’s defamation laws are ripe for overhaul”. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:17 am
David Rolph is a professor at the Sydney Law School This post was originally published in the Gazette of Law and Journalism, Australia’s leading online media law publication. [read post]
