Search for: "Rosalind English" Results 21 - 40 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2017, 5:07 am by Guest Contributor
Women who choose to exercise their sexual and reproductive rights have to travel to mainland Britain, but they have to face costs (about £900 in the recent case discussed by Rosalind English) that would not apply if they lived in England, Wales or Scotland. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:26 am by INFORRM
If you lose your mobile phone with highly confidential and private information on it, all may not be lost. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:08 am by INFORRM
Before the court in the case of Tickle v Council of the Borough of North Tyneside and others ([2015] EWHC 2991 (Fam)) were cross applications by a journalist and the local authority regarding care proceedings which the former wished to report. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
McLaughlin & Ors v London Borough of Lambeth & Anor [2010] EWHC 2726 (QB) The High Court has been asked to consider whether the rule which prevents public authorities from suing in libel – to allow uninhibited criticism of government institutions – has the effect of preventing libel actions being taken by individual managers and employees of those institutions. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of EW) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2009] EWHC 2957 (Admin) 18 November 2009 Summary and comment by Rosalind English Article 3 does not dictate a minimum standard of social support for those in need, nor does it require the state to provide a home or minimum level of financial assistance to all within its care. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
The causes of action invoked by the Plaintiff are described by the judge as “diffuse, and imaginative” and they run to an astonishing thirty claims, including Articles 2, 3 and 8 ECHR; Section 6 of HRA, The Data Protection Act 1988,The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and a recent libel decision of the English Court of Appeal in Tamiz  v  Google [2013] EWCA Civ 68 which we’ve posted on here. [read post]
27 May 2012, 4:07 pm by David Hart QC
Last week Rosalind English did a summary post on the important Supreme Court case of Lukaszewski and others, R (on the application of Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20 - read judgement. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:09 am by Erin Branigan
 Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia Edited by: Rosalind Dixon and Tom Ginsburg Comparative constitutional law is a field of increasing importance around the world, but much of the literature is focused on Europe,North America, and English-speaking jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
See the Supreme Court decision on this, posted by Rosalind English, which brought the whole matter to light. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
This is a shortened version of an article published by Rosalind English in the Journal of Environmental Law and Management November 2011: Cooperation and Public Goods: an evolutionary perspective on environmental law  23 ELM 278-283  In my 2011 post Why be nice? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (London Christian Radio Ltd and Anor) v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre ([2012] EWHC  1043 (Admin)) the High Court has upheld the refusal of the broadcasting regulator to clear an advertisement for transmission on the grounds that it offended the prohibition on political advertising. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
Public order cases involving protests have always sparked controversy, with the collision between the state’s responsibility to ensure the smooth running of civil society and the individual citizen’s right to draw attention to what they regard as a pressing moral concern. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:27 am by INFORRM
In the case of A healthcare NHS Trust v P & Q ([2015] EWCOP 15) the Court of Protection has clarified the position on revealing the identity of an incapacitated adult where reporting restrictions apply. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
In the case of V v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWCOP 21) the Court of Protection ruled that where a court has restricted the publication of information during proceedings that were in existence during a person’s lifetime, it has not only the right but the duty to consider, when requested to do so, whether that information should continue to be protected following the person’s death. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am by Adam Wagner
Rosalind English blogged here on the implications of the McFarlane judgment in light of rights under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of religion): This reflects something of a sea change in the judicial approach to the whole notion of “religious beliefs”. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Although an individual’s right to privacy is usually thought of in the context of state intrusion in one form or another, in reality the real threat of intrusion in a society such as ours comes from unsolicited marketing calls. [read post]