Search for: "Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Two days later, in response to Ms Rose’s concern about the reporting of her role in the matters brought to the ICO by Mr Farage, the ICO acknowledged that they did not investigate a complaint against Ms Rose nor give her an opportunity to comment on any findings in relation to her role. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is also investigating the incident. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
” Data Privacy and Data Protection On 22 June 2023, the Upper Tribunal confirmed the civil standard of proof applied in information law litigation with the judgment in Doorstep Dispensaree Lts v Information Commissioner [2023] UKUT 123 (AAC). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Former Facebook data scientist Francis Haugen’s new book argues that social media companies are still not being held accountable for the harms they cause users, especially young people. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On the same day, a statement was read out in resolution of the defamation case Dinah Rose KC v (1) Jonathan Ames (2) Times Media Ltd KB 2023-000485. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Respondent then rose from her seat and stated, “please don’t speak to me that way, because you don’t know my personality. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Respondent then rose from her seat and stated, “please don’t speak to me that way, because you don’t know my personality. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The social media blog, Socially Aware, analyses the implications [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Rose drew criticism from LGBTQ+ activists, including students at her college, for taking the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 30 January 2023, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal found MI5 agents “unlawfully retained people’s intercepted data,” via the use of surveillance warrants from 2014-2019, Liberty and Privacy International v Security Service [2023] UKIPTrib1. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The Twitter exchange between Riley and Rose is available here. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  The speech of the Commissioner for Human Rights at this conference is available here. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved Judge Lynn Griffin dismissed an appeal in Peter Beswick v Information Commissioner [2022] UKFTT 360 (GRC). [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Centre for Internet and Society blog has published an analysis of Peiter “Mudge” Zatko’s whistleblower complaint with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, filed in July 2022, which accuses the platform of serious security failings. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report has published a summary of Bill C-26: An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts, introduced on June 14 2022. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report has produced a summary of the European Commissioner’s Q&A on the Revised Standard Contractual Clauses. [read post]