Search for: "Rose v. Lundy" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2014, 10:39 am by Jon Sands
Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
" The discretion part has to be there because of language in the plurality opinion in Rose v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Better still would be a complete abandonment of Wainwright, which is no longer really necessary to advance finality and comity interests in criminal litigation in light of the later-adopted total-exhaustion rule of Rose v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IP finance)   Armenia Armenia proposes to get tough with infringers (1709 Blog)   Australia Peer-to-patent Australia (ipwars) (IPKat) Australian Senator Kate Lundy on ACTA (Michael Geist) Ramficiations of IceTV – no copyright in medical records - Primary Health Care Limited v Commissioner of Taxation ( The onus on appeal from a trade mark opposition: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP (ipwars) 2003 Designs Act appeal:… [read post]