Search for: "Rose v. U. S"
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
So that’s a bit of a pickle.] [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Improvements to the IRS’s technological infrastructure could reduce the tax gap while not creating new burdens for taxpayers. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The Court also found that the signs are conceptually different, since a stylized letter ‘h’, or two interlaced letters ‘u’, could be perceived in Huawei’s mark, whilst the stylized letters of the initials of Chanel’s founder (Coco Chanel) can be discerned in Chanel’s mark.Thus, the General Court held that the marks at issue are different. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
Hence, the plaintiff must “reasonably allege that the fee bore no rational relationship to the product delivered” (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), however, involving an alleged rap parody of the popular song “Pretty Woman”: [W]e reject Acuff-Rose’s argument that 2 Live Crew’s request for permission to use the original should be weighed against a finding of fair use. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:02 am
” Citing Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Privacy, Remedies and Comity: The Emerging Problem of Global Injunctions and Some Preliminary Thoughts On How Best to Address It, Part V, Chapter 19 in Comparative Privacy and Defamation 307-328 (András Koltay & Paul Wragg eds, Edward Elgar Publishing 2020), U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3723948, Ronald J. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
’s stock (id. 1J1f14-15). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
John’s University – School of Law. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Zhao v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Supreme Court unanimously held in Allen v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
Defendants cannot recast the claim as one for breach of contract to avail themselves of the longer six-year limitations period (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015], citing Kliment, 3 NY3d at 541-42; see Risk Control Assocs. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:50 pm
by Dennis Crouch The bench was an active inquisitor in the Thryv v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:57 am
Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 A.D.3 at 67; Cabrera v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 A.D.3d 59, 68 (1st Dept. 2015). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
U-Haul Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
Co., 135 U. [read post]
