Search for: "Rose v. U. S" Results 61 - 80 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants cannot recast the claim as one for breach of contract to avail themselves of the longer six-year limitations period (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 68 [1st Dept 2015], citing Kliment, 3 NY3d at 541-42; see Risk Control Assocs. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:57 am by Chris Castle
The CPI-U (all items) index rose .4% for the month to 12 month rate of 5.4%. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), however, involving an alleged rap parody of the popular song “Pretty Woman”: [W]e reject Acuff-Roses argument that 2 Live Crew’s request for permission to use the original should be weighed against a finding of fair use. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:31 am
Allen, 247 F.3d 741, 768 (8th Cir.2001) (ultimately, dispositive question is "whether Congress clearly intended to impose cumulative sentences for simultaneous violations of each of the statutes"), vacated and remanded for reconsideration on other grounds, 536 U .S. 953 (2002). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
” Along the same lines, I suppose you could argue that it’s fair use to copy reality television shows so long as you watch them ironically. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
” 2The parties subsequently settled; see Did Campbell v Acuff-Rose find 2 Live Crew’s song to be fair use? [read post]