Search for: "Rosen v. Rosen" Results 1 - 20 of 1,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 10:40 am by NCC Staff
Also, Rosen previewed an important religious freedom case before the Court in its next term, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:15 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by Dennis Crouch
In one of them, LKQ asked the court to rule that the current primary reference requirement for design patent obviousness, as stated in In re Rosen and Durling v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Professor Rosen examines the federal trademark laws from the mid-nineteenth century. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:16 pm by Rick Garnett
”  Consider, for example, Exhibit A in the usual conservative critique of overreaching judges, Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:11 am by NCC Staff
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Daily Record Staff
Rosen’s residence is located in the Conservation District and he wishes to continue to operate ... [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:05 am
Dorf concludes: "either Rosen didn't read or didn't... [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:08 pm by Christine Corcos
Much less famously, though, the same thing happened again 24 years later in a largely forgotten case, Warner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:08 pm
Much less famously, though, the same thing happened again 24 years later in a largely forgotten case, Warner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
(“Twitter”), files this Original Complaint against Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (“Wachtell”), and alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
(“Twitter”), files this Original Complaint against Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (“Wachtell”), and alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:05 am
Jeff Rosen makes "The Case Against Sotomayor. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:09 am
To be trotted out by Republicans: her 2001 speech at Berkeley and her decision in Ricci v. [read post]