Search for: "Rosenthal v. Rosenthal"
Results 81 - 100
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v… [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:33 am
Rosenthal, 173 A.D.3d 695, 103 N.Y.S.3d 107 (2nd Dept. 2019). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.,21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v Borenkoff,262 AD2d at… [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials (the A/V rating is only for lawyers considered the top in their field). [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 1:45 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Rosenthal Co., 246 F. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:55 pm
While it also found for the plaintiff on his Rosenthal Act claim, the jury found for the bank on the plaintiff’s invasion of privacy claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:39 pm
During his clerkship with Judge Rosenthal, Mr. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:53 pm
Petro has an “A/V” rating from the world’s leading lawyer referral service, Martindale-Hubbell, as well as a Superb rating on Avvo, an online legal services marketplace. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:02 pm
So begins Judge Rosenthal’s order of May 4 in White v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled in Gilliam v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:44 pm
Rosenthal. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In support of their motion, the defendants submitted the transcript of the court proceeding setting forth the terms of the settlement of the underlying action, which conclusively established that the plaintiff was not coerced into settling (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757 [2014]; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Laruccia v Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino & Cohn, 295… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
In support of their motion, the defendants submitted the transcript of the court proceeding setting forth the terms of the settlement of the underlying action, which conclusively established that the plaintiff was not coerced into settling (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545; Laruccia v Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino & Cohn, 295 AD2d 321, 322). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm
The lawsuit became known as O’Donnell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:44 pm
To review the bidding; in Wittmer v. [read post]
