Search for: "Ross v. Gore" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
” The justices gave the government a partial victory in that round, prohibiting the challengers from deposing Ross but allowing the Gore deposition and the other fact-finding to go forward. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Amy Howe
The justices also agreed to review Cochise Consultancy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
The challengers wanted to take the depositions of Wilbur Ross, the Secretary of Commerce, and John Gore, the acting head of the civil rights division of the Department of Justice, and obtain evidence outside the official government record considered by Ross in making his decision; in late October, the justices blocked Ross’ deposition but allowed the Gore deposition and factfinding, and eventually the trial itself, to go forward. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Mark Graber
Gore (2000) in his early years on the Court to Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am by Marcia Coyle
Gore ruling, the court is likely to fall to the side as an election issue, victim of more pressing voter concerns, such as the economy or health insurance. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, in a post first published at Howe on the Court, Amy Howe reports that “[t]he federal government went to the Supreme Court [yesterday], requesting a halt to the depositions of two senior Trump administration officials – Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and John Gore, the acting head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division – in a challenge to Ross’ decision to bring back a question about citizenship on… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
The challengers also demanded additional extra-record discovery, including depositions of Ross and Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division John Gore. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the 1992 and 1996 races, Ross Perot drained votes away from the major candidates, and twice denied Bill Clinton an overall popular majority of national votes. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm by Mark Walsh
Today is the oral argument in one of the term’s biggest cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]