Search for: "Rostker v. Goldberg" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Congress has expressed few concerns about female physical ability, but did focus more on societal consequences of drafting young mothers to go off to war, Miller said.This goes against the Supreme Court case Rostker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:50 am by Steve Lash
Welcome to Monday, the 37th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Rostker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am
(And I say that as the daughter of a woman who joined the Army in WWII and worked in the care of men who suffered from combat fatigue until she was seen as more useful for her typing skill.)I've taught the Supreme Court case Rostker v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
I summarized the reasons why in this 2013 post written after a previous expansion of the range of combat positions in which women are allowed to serve: In the 1981 case of <em>Rostker v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
Such rhetoric is reminiscent of Chief Justice Rehnquist’s in Rostker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 am
. *** I've been thinking about this problem quite a bit over the years as I teach the old Supreme Court case Rostker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Steve Vladeck
Whatever the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims (the latter of which may well be foreclosed by Rostker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Colin Miller
Ballard, 419 U.S. 498, 508…(1975) (different treatment of men and women reflects, not archaic and overbroad generalizations, but, instead, the demonstrable fact that male and female line officers in the Navy are not similarly situated); Rostker v. [read post]