Search for: "Rothman v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2023, 2:11 pm
[United Kingdom][Discovery motion to compel granted] Rothman v Rothman 2022 WL 20208933 ( N.D. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 6:59 am
United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 10:30 am
Rothman v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(See Rothman v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:54 am
Rothman & Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:09 pm
As to the point about "advocating," IPBiz notes the CAFC cited Rothman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:49 am
Schwarzenegger and Plata v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
Rubin & Rothman, 97 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The latter role has no analogue in the United States, where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only over the smallest range of matters and serves almost exclusively as an appellate body. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Rothman & Co. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
Act No. 425 The right of publicity is not a new concept in the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
