Search for: "Rothman v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 8:37 pm by Schachtman
Egilman filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As to the point about "advocating," IPBiz notes the CAFC cited Rothman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Joshua Matz
United States, the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 8:49 pm by Larry Catá Backer
See, e.g., SA Rothmans International France and SA Philip Morris France, Rec. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]