Search for: "Rothman v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:11 pm
[United Kingdom][Discovery motion to compel granted] Rothman v Rothman 2022 WL 20208933 ( N.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
In its landmark case United Mizrahi Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The latter role has no analogue in the United States, where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only over the smallest range of matters and serves almost exclusively as an appellate body. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On 16 December 2022, Rothman J granted leave to the claimant to file a fourth amended statement of claim so that it pleads further and better particulars that reflect a material fact in Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 1725. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
Act No. 425 The right of publicity is not a new concept in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
(For more information on the rights of privacy and publicity, which are primarily protected by state law, see Rothman’s Roadmap to the Right of Publicity.) [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” Other cases cite Representative Kastenmeier’s statement that the law “specifically extends only to false and misleading speech that is encompassed within the ‘commercial speech’ doctrine developed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Rothman & Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
Saskatchewan (“Rothmans“) and Quebec (Attorney General) v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
This was the first statutory recognition of any type of right of privacy in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]
