Search for: "Rowe v. Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Kiera Flynn
Kelly (No. 11A210). [read post]
13 May 2008, 7:40 am
Death row inmates may petition the federal system to review their cases after they have run out of appeals in state courts. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:18 pm by James Clark
Another aspect of Kelly Gissendaner’s case that is drawing attention is the life she’s led since entering death row. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Harris has been on death row for eighteen years, yet has chosen onlythis moment, with his execution imminent, to challengea procedure for lethal injection that the state has usedfor an even longer period of time. . . . [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:11 pm
Kelly proved to be such a capital dog the Justices did not even bother to adjudicate the death row defendant's claims. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
"The Supreme Court halted the execution of Virginia death row inmate Christopher Scott Emmett, and decided to review the constitutionality of lethal injection, and whether the procedure amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:53 pm by Jon Sands
  Petitioner has been on death row for almost 40 years.AFPD Mike Burke of the AZ FPD - CHU (Phoenix) and AFPD  Kelly Culshaw (now of the Calif E - CHU) fought long and hard on this case.The decision is here:https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/05/26/14-99008.pdf Williams v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
” It observed that the Second Circuit has embraced this test, most recently in its decision in Cariou v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Iterative but for different purpose: Kelly v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports that the Justices did not appear swayed by the arguments of a death row inmate appealing his sentence in Magwood v. [read post]