Search for: "Royall v. Legislation & Policy Division"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Royal Packing Company (2000) 22 Cal.4th 575, 592; Skyline Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
The case is discussed in an news item on the 5RB website entitled “Rare defamation decision in Chancery Division” On 16 January 2020 Jay J handed down judgment om the case of Wright v Granath [2010] EWHC 51 (QB). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Sir Nicholas Wall, President of the Family Division of the High Court, “called for a debate on the level of access the media have to hearings held by the Court of Protection, followed by new legislation”, reports PA Media Lawyer. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
It served as an interim legislative assembly during the crisis. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
(Eleonora takes the floor).* Confidence, privacy and a question of fax: butler's claim can't be struck outPaul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) is a High Court, Chancery Division decision addressing a sad story of faxes, Royal Families, and litigation that should end up with a settlement. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
for claims against its subsidiary – sometimes with success, sometimes not: For example, in Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, the English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, by its Technology and Construction Court, decided that it had no international jurisdiction to hear claims in tort against the Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) of Royal Dutch Shell (RDC) in connection with environmental and health damages due to oil pollution in the… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Has the permissive language of “may” referred to the in the SCC decision in CBC v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
The Assisted Dying Bill [Lords] was given a second reading without division and committed to a Committee of the whole House. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
In this case, those principles--grounded in a consequential division between public and private functions, between autonomous institutions and divisible functions within such organizations, and between regulation and management--may be losing its coherence in the face of new regulatory structures centered on production chains and national development models. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
” Abramski v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am
Borah Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
A guide for self-represented litigants making applications to the Interim Applications Court of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court has been published by the judiciary. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
But President Biden is under great pressure to heal the “tribal division” in U.S. politics even at risk of leaving the potentially lethal terrorist infection within the body politic waiting to burst open the wound and later the scar. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm
In order to allow the legislative and executive branches to enact new legislation and policies to govern medical assistance in dying, the Supreme Court had initially suspended the declaration of invalidity for a period of 12 months. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
High Court Division’s power of Judicial Review: The power of judicial review of the High Court Division is evoked under Article 102 of the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
Whilst EU law has changed since 1998, and the Scotland Act was framed to take account of dynamic nature of EU law, the basic division of policy responsibilities is set out in Schedule 5 and does not change. 1533: Looking at the implications of withdrawal, the Lord Advocate submits that, if EU law ceases to apply in UK, that does not affect the division of policy responsibility in Schedule 5 of the Scotland Act. [read post]
