Search for: "Rubber Company v. Goodyear" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In 1888, Goodyear was considered generic for a process for making rubber. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anthony D. Romero
 In 2006, the court ruled against Lilly Ledbetter, who had been paid less than male colleagues in comparable jobs at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
Goodyear Rubber Co., which held that "Goodyear Rubber Company" was not "capable of exclusive appropriation," the term "Goodyear Rubber" being generic. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:57 am by Jessica Litman
Ross relied heavily on an 1888 Supreme Court decision, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice interrupts Ross with a question about the government’s reliance on an 1888 case involving the Goodyear Rubber Co. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
[T]he name of “Goodyear Rubber Company” is not one capable of exclusive appropriation. [read post]