Search for: "Rubber Company v. Goodyear" Results 61 - 80 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
In its decision, the high court declared that Ledbetter could not sue her employer, the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, for wage discrimination because she had not filed a complaint within 180 days after the day they established her wage (that is, the day Goodyear commenced discriminating against her). [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:05 pm by William Ryan Moore
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. in 2007, a controversial decision by the high court, notes Broward accident lawyer Alitowski. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) 550 U.S. __. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:38 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
The law was named after the Alabama women who struggled to hold Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company accountable for paying her far less than men at the company doing the same work. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:03 am by Jessica Litman
” The PTO rule follows an 1888 Supreme Court case, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:45 am by Jessica Litman
” The PTO rule follows an 1888 Supreme Court case, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 12:18 pm
Goodyear Tire and Rubber case, in which discriminated workers have only a narrow time-frame to file a complaint in the face of ongoing discrimination, was wrong and Congress should work to clarify the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
 In May 2007, the Court ruled in Ledbetter v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:31 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Goodyear Tire & Rubber, ensured that women would still have the opportunity to get into court to fight pay discrimination. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 3:55 pm
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 127 S.Ct. 2162, handed down just over a year ago. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
(Sevenson) and The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear), commenced this action for a declaration that Sirius was obligated to defend and indemnify them in the underlying personal injury action brought by TJI's employee. [read post]