Search for: "Ruben v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Palm v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:43 am
Caplan argues that "the state Appellate Division's punt in this case merits our attention. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
Ruben Flores-Villar v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:59 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Lizzett MartinezCounty Group 15 - Ruben Yury Alcoba v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:34 am
OF REVENUE, ET AL. 09-5801 FLORES-VILLAR, RUBEN v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
Facts: This case (Romero v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
Ruben Castaneda of the Washington Post has a story on the potential impact of Monday’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:43 pm
Ruben Flores-Villar was born abroad in 1974. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Meanwhile, once in Las Vegas, respondent enrolled Z.M.F.Z. in the Ruben P. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
State Comp. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:44 pm
The order in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:02 pm
Chief Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois relied on a similar case, Silverman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
In one sense, the stakes in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Instant Technology, LLC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm
In ordering the transfer, Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois stated, "After a careful review of the Defendants' pending motion to transfer and Plaintiff's response thereto, the pending motion to transfer is granted for the reasons outlined by Judge William Hart in the related case of Hudson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:06 am
(See McDonald v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:06 am
(See McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
