Search for: "Ruben v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
In the latest and strongest worded of such decisions, the Western District of Texas federal court last week decided Ruben A. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
Here in Ohio, there's been all sorts of litigation.In state court, a trial judge decided in the cases of Ruben Rivera and Ronald McCloud, who were facing capital charges but hadn't actually been tried, that Ohio's method of lethal injection was unconstitutional because Ohio inmates had a right created by state statute to a painless lethal injection death and Ohio's killing system carried an unnecessary risk of inflicting pain. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
"The plaintiff further alleges that it was and still is, the duty of said defendant, to furnish him with maintenance and cure and loss of wages," it states. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 7:16 am
While Betancourt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
See Ruben Baez Godoy v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:56 am
State, supra. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:26 am
It also relies on Couch v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
U.S., 365 F.3d 980, 984 (11th Cir.2004); quoting Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:16 am
Betancourt v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Med Ctr. of Queens v State Farm Auto Ins. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:21 pm
On March 25, in the case of one of these five (Medellin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
" ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, EVIDENCE, INJURY AND TORT LAW, PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE Rubens v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:34 am
The lethal injection index, with coverage of Baze v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 am
Pickering (argue); Jay Witt (brief)State's waiver of revocation by delayMay 13-Tuesday-a.m.State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Yusupov v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
This is a cerebral palsy resource guide for the State of Indiana. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
