Search for: "Rumpole" Results 581 - 600 of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 10:11 am by David Oscar Markus
Rumpole and I have discussed it and dealt with it in our own ways, but it's not an easy problem. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 8:37 am
I would post an over/under on when he'll be headed out of here, but I don't want to take any more of Rumpole's $... [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 5:00 am
Monday morning has me swamped....So, if you are interested in the big Supreme Court decisions that came out today (including the Bong Hits for Jesus case), check out Scotusblog.com.If you are interested in reading a great legal blog, check out the WSJ blog.If you want fun legal gossip, check out Abovethelaw.comAnd if you want some law and some other interesting stuff all mixed together, check out Althouse.And there's always Rumpole for our state court updates.Will get back to SDFLA… [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:52 am by David Oscar Markus
What Rumpole doesn't tell you is that Scalia also dissented in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:03 pm by Guest Blogger
Today, Rumpole did a nice job mopping up and reporting regarding the finalists. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
And even with two Judges, Rumpole believes the bond hearings will not be done as quickly and efficiently as Judge Klein did them. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:14 am
Rumpole notes they will never unleash that Genie from the bottle as it will turn jurisprudence on it's "head". [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:03 am by Rumpole
It's never too early to prepare, and in that regard we present to our own Rumpole's Hurricane Preparedness List ( (c) Rumpole 2012, all rights reserved.) [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:07 am by Rumpole
Your client, if he or she jumps through some hoops and pays a boatload of money (it's always about money Rumpole, isn't it?) [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:52 am
Rumpole replies that this blogger service is free and therefore you get what you pay for. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:38 am
As the close out memo states, there was no criminal motive for the Judges to execute forged loyalty oaths (other than them being Rumpole), and while it appears that the notary for all three oaths was the same employee in the Court's large bureaucracy, no criminal charges are being brought because of the statute of limitations.As to Judge Tunis's findings in some obscure Bar disciplinary proceeding, do you really care? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:32 pm
"(emphasis added by Rumpole.)In the interest of disclosure, Mr. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 7:31 am
Rumpole says: a sad but understandable situation. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 5:23 am
 Now, Rumpole says, is time to show the Republicans that they should be careful what they ask for, because they may get it. [read post]