Search for: "Rush v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2025, 10:43 am by Christopher Bosch and Lucas Amodio
” Industry participants might fairly claim that these efforts are far from the SEC “giving up” and leaving an “enforcement vacuum” that states must rush to fill. [read post]
12 May 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
The court narrowed the business judgment rule, not because the board acted in bad faith, but because the process appeared rushed and colored by personal conflict. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by John D. Graham
There is nothing, for example, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 7:54 am by Dennis Shlionsky
And state leadership is stepping up with the creation of The Target Zero Commission, a 13-member group consisting of state officials from the Department of Transportation (DOT), State Police, along with the Division of Highway Traffic Safety, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority, regional transportation officials, and others who will work together to make New Jersey’s roads safer for drivers and pedestrians. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 7:11 am
United States, which would allow the president to do just that. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am by Dr. Adam Feldman
Her recent vote in Department of State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 10:15 am by Josh Richman
  For the order denying the motion to dismiss: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-motion-dismiss  For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint  For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management  Contacts  Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org  Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps,… [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 8:28 am by Evan Bernick
Republicans, like the abolitionists before them, swore by Worcester v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the core idea underlying the modern First Amendment is that the government may not as Justice Jackson put it in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment periods… [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 3:06 pm by Tobin Admin
Instead, the evidence showed that the defendant was driving approximately 25 to 30 mph—well below the speed limit on the interstate highway, in stop-and-go traffic at rush hour, and that he applied his brakes before colliding with the plaintiff, who’d stopped ahead of him. [read post]