Search for: "Russell v. Miller" Results 61 - 80 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Berman of Sentencing Law and Policy links to two articles providing “interesting perspectives on how two counties are trying to figure out just what the Supreme Court’s Miller [v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by Amy Howe
Mantich, in which the Court had been asked to consider whether its decision in Miller v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am by Katherine Morris
On 8 March 2024, Judge Russell SC delivered judgment in SafeWork NSW v Miller Logistics Pty Ltd; SafeWork NSW v Mitchell Doble [2024] NSWDC 58 (Doble). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm by Colin O'Keefe
City of Carmel - California lawyer Arthur Coon of Miller Starr Regalia on the firm's blog, CEQA Developments Fashion Law 101: Sensory Trademarks - Los Angeles lawyer Staci Riordan of Fox Rothschild on the firm's Fashion Law Blog What Does The Supreme Court's Ruling In US v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Federalist, Mark Miller argues that “[t]he First Amendment includes the right not to speak, but the FACT Act takes that right away. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]