Search for: "Russo v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
  The  US Supreme Court’s decision a couple of weeks back in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Kalvis Golde
Clayton County, Georgia, 6-3) Blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to rescind deportation protections for undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Russo, the majority even acknowledged that there will be a disproportionate burden on the poor. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
Russo, and says that accepting the arguments of Louisiana and the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
RUSSO & APOZNANSKI, Cross-Claimant, -against- MONTFORT, HEALY, MCGUIRE & SALLEY, LLP, Cross-Claim Defendant, MONTFORT, HEALY, MCGUIRE & SALLEY, LLP, Cross-Claimant, -against- RUSSO & APOZNANSKI, Cross-Claim Defendant, 07-CV-2514 (JS) (AKT);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide next term “what constitutes criminal “computer misuse” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:21 am by David Oscar Markus
”Prelogar, arguing for the United States in support of Jackson Women’s Health, says, “The real-world effects of overruling Roe and Casey would be severe and swift. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
 That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
 United States, SCOTUS held that a person charged with a crime has standing to challenge the law under which she is charged on federalism grounds even though she is an individual, not a state. [read post]