Search for: "Rutan v. Republican Party" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
In addition, the US Supreme Court has ruled that it is unlawful to refuse to employ, promote or transfer a public employee because of his or her political affiliations unless those political affiliations are "an appropriate requirement" for the position involved [Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois, 497 US 62]. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Among the significant cases addressing this issue are Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347; Branti v Finkel, 445 US 507 and Rutan v Republican Party of Illi­nois, 497 US 62.* Although the decision does not address Miller’s probationary obligation, "probationary employees" in fact hold permanent appointments and may enjoy limited tenure rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Republican Party of Illinois (1990)), so the First Amendment bar on terminating contracts based on First Amendment activity applies to refusals to contract. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:47 pm by Deborah Hammonds
Supreme Court in Rutan v Republican Party of Illinois (497 U.S. 62 (1990) do not apply. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
Republican Party of Illinois was one of the cases that exemplified his interpretive convictions. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
In addition, he filed claims against the individual defendants under the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act and a claim against the Town under the Massachusetts Whistleblower Act.In addressing the merits of Welch's claims the court said:In Rutan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Republican Party, 497 U.S. 62 (1990) (applying Elrod and Branti to hiring); O’Hare Truck Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
Republican Party of Illinois (1990). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Republican Party, 497 U.S. 62 (1990) (applying Elrod and Branti to hiring); O’Hare Truck Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1990 case of Rutan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 65 (1990), decisions not to license professionals based on their speech should be subject to the same First Amendment standard as decisions to withdraw a license based on speech.) [read post]