Search for: "Rutherford v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 8:31 pm by Sme
National Science Foundation (10th Cir., April 26, 2017) (denying Craine's petition for review:  his disclosures, as a former employee of Kansas State University, did not fall within the whistleblower protections of 41 U.S.C. ss. 4712)*Jackson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
A decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The decision below: Rutherford and A Following the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the claimants in Rutherford and A were (necessarily) at pains to show that their position was more closely analogous to Burnip v Birmingham City Council than to MA. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court… [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 1:50 pm
Many states even refuse to disclose information about their execution procedures to lawyers whose clients will be subjected to lethal injections.The lethal injection index, with full coverage of Baze v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the “bedroom… [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Rutherford    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitBOYCE F. [read post]