Search for: "Rutherford v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm by sgottlieb
[1] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm by sgottlieb
[1] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm by sgottlieb
[i] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:10 pm by sgottlieb
[i] Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner, Heien v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Nor, it seems, was the Upper Tribunal taken to the Admin Court’s judgment in Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) [our report], by either the tenant’s representative or by the DWP. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  And, in any event, it contended that the Supreme Court settled the issue against this kind of challenge in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by David Markus
United States, along with significant help from a leading sentencing scholar, the libertarian Cato Institute and the Rutherford Institute. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
” The Litigation There are a total of 66 victim claims in litigation in more than a dozen states. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) This was the Judicial Review, supported by CPAG, of the failure of the bedroom tax regulations to address the position of tenants where a bedroom was needed for overnight carers for a child. [read post]