Search for: "Rutherford v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Other clauses use the word "office" or "officer" followed by a modifier, such as "of the United States," "under the United States," or "under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:55 pm
" Apparently, the only judicial decision on the meaning of "part or parts" in the FFA was United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 10:01 pm
He ran for the United States House of Representatives in 1876, but was defeated. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
When Rutherford B. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
From State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
As the Court later found in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:05 pm
” The United States Supreme Court in Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
And there seems to be no dispute that in the United States now a venue error is waivable. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am
It does not purport to be a disclaimer, it was not acknowledged before “a judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of any court; a United States commissioner or magistrate; or any notary public or civil-law notary of this state,” and it was not recorded. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:44 pm
Democracy (such as it is) in the United States seems to have temporarily survived a violent attack on its legislature. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sandy began complaining about the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Flores, but when the Democrats blinked and let the RFRA of 2000 pass–and the Rutherford Institute fanned out to the 50 states to enact state RFRAs–the religious liberty weapons they needed to fight for their beliefs about abortion were available.I suppose, in their defense, they were relying on Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:03 am
This Court's conclusion in Hamdi v. [read post]
