Search for: "Rutledge v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
For some reason that’s why it struck me that United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
As defense counsel we all need a Hamish (not one we have killed of course).  Sentencing is often the time in a trial when the ability to put as much favorable influential evidence or information before the fact-finder is at its apogee.  That’s a good thing because the actual fundamental purpose of sentencing is – to parse the rules, “to mete out an appropriate sentence for this offender and offenses.”  For some reason that’s why it struck me that United… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:28 am by Viking
As defense counsel we all need a Hamish (not one we have killed of course).  Sentencing is often the time in a trial when the ability to put as much favorable influential evidence or information before the fact-finder is at its apogee.  That’s a good thing because the actual fundamental purpose of sentencing is – to parse the rules, “to mete out an appropriate sentence for this offender and offenses.”  For some reason that’s why it struck me that United… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:24 pm by Daniel Nazer
The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts has filed a motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit requesting that the court allow it ten minutes of oral argument as amicus curiae in the case of Cariou v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Maynard of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the United States, and Jay T. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:56 am by Beth Graham
Drahozal, University of Kansas School of Law, have authored a paper that uses empirical evidence to examine the effect the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
 Guess when third-party liability insurance started in the United States? [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
Rutledge, Jr. won over many legal commentators; indeed, they were discussed favorably in the Court's invalidation in Hamdan v. [read post]