Search for: "Ryan E. Long" Results 241 - 260 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Bill Marler
Jordan was among those who became severely ill after consuming E. colicontaminated romaine lettuce. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:36 am by Bill Marler
Jordan was among those who became severely ill after consuming E. colicontaminated romaine lettuce. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
For Smokers Trying to Quit, Information Could Be Key April 4, 2018 | Kelly Funderburk With cigarette use continuing to be the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, exchanging cigarettes for e-cigarettes could go a long way toward reversing this fatal trend. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Two states repealed their estate taxes in 2018, continuing a decade-long trend away from taxes on estates and inheritances. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am by Schachtman
Gassert, Tony Fletcher, and Yv Bonnier Viger. 7 John Henderson Duffus, Ronald E. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Ryan, Constitutional Law (5th ed. 2017), at p. 85). [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Richard Hunt
The Court found that his expertise in e-commerce did not qualify him as an expert on accessibility. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:09 am by Howard Bashman
“Appeals court considers ‘how long is too long’ in challenge to Guantanamo detention”: Ann E. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm by Guest Blogger
Digital tech companies have long employed terms of service and digital rights management technologies to limit how consumers use purchased products—say, to keep consumers from sharing music or accessing an e-book. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” At Good Judgment, Ryan Adler recaps the crowd’s performance in forecasting Supreme Court outcomes last term, noting that a record of “[e]ight, four, and one would be respectable in many sports leagues. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Harold Hongju Koh
Adam Cox, Ryan Goodman and Cristina Rodriguez well described the court’s standard: “[E]ven if we know that an immigration policy was motivated by blatant official animus against a religion, the policy should be sustained so long as the government proffers some rational national security basis for it. [read post]