Search for: "Ryan Goodman" Results 241 - 260 of 336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:33 am by Ritika Singh
Ryan Goodman of the Guardian has an op-ed describing why, under the laws of war, force-feeding Guantanamo detainees “violates international law and thus lacks domestic authority. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:32 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  Ryan Goodman and Sarah Knuckey have a careful analysis of the speech that note its ambiguities and uncertainties on the geographical scope of the war, the continued use of signature strikes, the meaning of non-feasible captures as prerequisite for strikes, whether Americans “not specifically targeted” (in the President’s words) were targeted as part of a signature strike or some other reason that prevented the president from describing their deaths as… [read post]
25 May 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Jack noted some additional post-speech commentary by Ryan Goodman and Sarah Knuckey. [read post]
25 May 2013, 5:43 am by Jack Goldsmith
Ryan Goodman and Sarah Knuckey maintain that the new targeting framework announced by the President “raises some troubling questions and leaves important older questions completely unanswered. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:46 am by Robert Chesney
  The debate involves Professor Ryan Goodman, on one hand, and an array of posts from Professors Kevin Heller, Jens Ohlin, Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen (the last four writing collectively). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:13 am by Robert Chesney
  The debate involves Professor Ryan Goodman, on one hand, and both Professor Kevin Heller and a group consisting of Professors Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen writing collectively. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:55 pm
Here's the abstract:In a recent essay, Ryan Goodman offers a vigorous defense of the duty to capture under the law of war and concludes that attacking soldiers have a duty to use the least-restrictive means of accomplishing their objective. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:17 pm by Robert Chesney
I have been curating a running debate about whether LOAC requires an attempt to capture rather than a first-resort to lethal force in some circumstances, sparked by a paper from Professor Ryan Goodman and including responses and more from Professors Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, Eric Jensen, and Kevin Heller. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:16 am by Robert Chesney
  The debate involves Professor Ryan Goodman, on one hand, and Professors Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen writing collectively on the other. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Robert Chesney
  The debate involves Professor Ryan Goodman, on one hand, and Professors Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen writing collectively on the other. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:13 am by Robert Chesney
The following is a guest post from Ryan Goodman, continuing a conversation begun yesterday in this post from Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:29 am by Kenneth Anderson
Jack Goldsmith has flagged NYU professor Ryan Goodman’s European Journal of International Law article, “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants,” as well as a Slate article by Goodman drawn from that academic journal piece, “The Lesser Evil: What the Obama administration isn’t telling you about drones: the standard rule is capture, not kill. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:52 pm by Robert Chesney
Capture Instead of Kill: A Dangerous Conflation of Law and Policy By Professors Geoffrey Corn, Laurie Blank, Christopher Jenks, and Eric Talbot Jensen In a provocative essay on drone strikes in Slate, Professor Ryan Goodman claims that the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) imposes a capture before kill requirement when targeting members of an enemy belligerent group. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
As Jack already noted, Ryan Goodman writes over in Slate on what the history of the law of armed conflict illustrates about the argument put forth in the DOJ white paper. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:54 am by Jack Goldsmith
Ryan Goodman follows up his EJIL draft with a briefer and more pointed version of the argument in Slate. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:59 am by Jack Goldsmith
Ryan Goodman has a timely and important new article, forthcoming in EJIL, entitled The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 1:25 am
Ryan Goodman (New York Univ. - Law) has posted The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants (European Journal of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]