Search for: "S. COTUS"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 10:10 am
So before arguing their first case in the nation's top court, advocates should look within their soul and ask, "Am I truly ready? [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:37 pm
COTUS - it looked like the court had converted a rule of procedure into a jurisdictional requirement. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:00 pm
S. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:34 am
Cotus's summary of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:40 am
“S. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:39 am
COTUS on April 21, 2008 at 12:13 PM [read post]
24 Mar 2006, 2:39 pm
COTUS at Appellate Law & Policy has more on this opinion here. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 8:10 am
S. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
And for fellow AL&P blogger S. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:22 am
Cotus snark), and Above the Law (with the perfect David Lat headline for the story: "An L.A. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:18 pm
Cotus offered a snarky reply at Appellate Law & Practice. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:12 pm
Cotus's conclusion that 20% of men would be rapists if the 20% of women as victims number were true. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 6:46 pm
COTUS that just looking at reported cases seems like a mistake. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
And you can find S. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
Cotus", who rounded-up several worthy comments on the 2d Amendment case and concluded with some observations of his own: "[C]onsidering that the 2-1 panel had to bridge several issues that they considered close . . . it is problematic to say that this result is based on the "plain language" of the constitution. [read post]
