Search for: "S. Donnelly" Results 21 - 40 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
No: Justices Kennedy and Donnelly Terry Shaffer’s First Proposition of Law Accepted for Review Ohio’s Voiding Statute applies equally to wills executed in compliance with R.C. 2107.03 and wills submitted pursuant to R.C. 2107.24. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am by MBettman
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Fischer, in which Justices Kennedy and Donnelly concurred in judgment only, the Court held that reasonable parental discipline is not a component of the physical harm element of Ohio’s domestic violence and assault statutes but is rather an affirmative defense to those charges. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart No: Chief Justice O’ Connor and Justices Kennedy and Fischer Belinda’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition of Law 1 A party’s request for custody does not constitute a complete abrogation of the physician-patient privilege under R.C. 3217.02(B) [sic.] where the mental and physical health records do not relate to the party’s ability to parent… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Fischer, Donnelly, and Stewart voted for dismissal. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, Fischer, DeWine, and Donnelly* No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Kennedy and Stewart *Justices French, DeWine, and Donnelly would accept the appeal on both propositions of law. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor* and Justices French,* Stewart,* DeWine, Donnelly, Kennedy, and Fischer *Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices French and Stewart would have certified the conflict only as to In re Z.E.N., 2018-Ohio-2208. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices French, Fischer, and Donnelly No: Justices Kennedy, DeWine, and Stewart Smith’s First Proposition of Law Accepted for Review Evidence of prior acts pertaining to criminal charges which resulted in acquittal should be barred from admission in a subsequent criminal case. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:01 am by Kristen Matteucci
According to George Donnelly, Attorney at the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, the bill creates a “comprehensive framework” to protect children from “the public health crisis caused by lead paint. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am by MBettman
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 150 (2006) (A trial court’s deprivation of a criminal defendant’s choice of counsel entitles him to reversal of his conviction.) [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by MBettman
” Justice Donnelly, Majority Opinion “The appellate court’s editorializing and commentary, while eye-catching, does not carry with it any weight of authority overruling our precedent in Lansdowne or creating a new duty or fault standard in private-figure defamation cases. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am by MBettman
It is the state’s position that the statute does not explicitly state or require that, nor does the statute require a hearing to determine the defendant’s ability to pay. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am by MBettman
  Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices DeWine and Donnelly, and Judge Waite, subbing for Justice Fischer, concurred. [read post]